Comments on: Testing the Current Upstream Linux Kernel http://news.opensuse.org/2007/08/15/testing-the-current-upstream-linux-kernel/ The latest news from the openSUSE project Sat, 25 May 2013 20:00:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: jengelh http://news.opensuse.org/2007/08/15/testing-the-current-upstream-linux-kernel/comment-page-1/#comment-344 jengelh Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:01:48 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=137#comment-344 So install apparmor from factory.

]]> By: Anonymous http://news.opensuse.org/2007/08/15/testing-the-current-upstream-linux-kernel/comment-page-1/#comment-294 Anonymous Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:20:37 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=137#comment-294 I am using the repo for 10.2. As of 2.6.23_rc3_g28e8351a-32.1 apparmor-parser and apparmor-profiles conflicts with kernel-default. Also, perl-Bootloader from http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dirkmueller/openSUSE_10.2/i586/ is a required dependency.

Sure, kernel bugs should be reported upstream, but what about packaging ones? I’d like to see seamless integration with the current version of openSUSE and the upstream development kernel.

]]> By: Nikolay Derkach http://news.opensuse.org/2007/08/15/testing-the-current-upstream-linux-kernel/comment-page-1/#comment-286 Nikolay Derkach Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:06:31 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=137#comment-286 This is likely because you are using openSUSE 10.2.
Try this repo: http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Kernel:/Vanilla/openSUSE_10.2/

]]> By: Anonymous http://news.opensuse.org/2007/08/15/testing-the-current-upstream-linux-kernel/comment-page-1/#comment-278 Anonymous Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:35:30 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=137#comment-278 Unfortunately, apparmor-parser and apparmor-profiles conflict with the upstream development kernel. How difficult would it be to have these working as well?

]]>