<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sneak Peeks at openSUSE 10.3: Virtualisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.opensuse.org/2007/09/27/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-virtualisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/09/27/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-virtualisation/</link>
	<description>The latest stuff happening in the openSUSE universe</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Irving Popovetsky</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/09/27/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-virtualisation/#comment-2366</link>
		<dc:creator>Irving Popovetsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=371#comment-2366</guid>
		<description>Okay, so it needs to be said here because this fact is not documented anywhere else:

VMWare's VMI/paravirt-ops technology only works with 32-bit (i386) guests.   I was able to get confirmation in &lt;a href="https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282026#c13" rel="nofollow"&gt;this Novell bugzilla ticket (282026)&lt;/a&gt;

I spent a good hour trying to figure out why this wouldn't work on my 64-bit guest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so it needs to be said here because this fact is not documented anywhere else:</p>
<p>VMWare&#8217;s VMI/paravirt-ops technology only works with 32-bit (i386) guests.   I was able to get confirmation in <a href="https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282026#c13" rel="nofollow">this Novell bugzilla ticket (282026)</a></p>
<p>I spent a good hour trying to figure out why this wouldn&#8217;t work on my 64-bit guest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank A. Kohler</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/09/27/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-virtualisation/#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank A. Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=371#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>Martin,

please find SLE kernels at 
http://openvz.org/download/kernel/suse10/

Feedback appreciated.


best regards,
Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin,</p>
<p>please find SLE kernels at<br />
<a href="http://openvz.org/download/kernel/suse10/" rel="nofollow">http://openvz.org/download/kernel/suse10/</a></p>
<p>Feedback appreciated.</p>
<p>best regards,<br />
Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Massimo Montecchi</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/09/27/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-virtualisation/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>Massimo Montecchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=371#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>Take a very closed look at Virt-Manager; we need it, to use in very productive way the virtualization capability of OpenSUSE 10.3.
Great product!!! Thanks a lot SuSE team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a very closed look at Virt-Manager; we need it, to use in very productive way the virtualization capability of OpenSUSE 10.3.<br />
Great product!!! Thanks a lot SuSE team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/09/27/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-virtualisation/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=371#comment-878</guid>
		<description>What about linux-vserver and OpenVZ, which offer less overhead and can achieve greater density? Are there any plans to support one of them in opensuse/sle*? I know this two project are quite different from projects mentioned above, but still I find them very interesting and promising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about linux-vserver and OpenVZ, which offer less overhead and can achieve greater density? Are there any plans to support one of them in opensuse/sle*? I know this two project are quite different from projects mentioned above, but still I find them very interesting and promising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/09/27/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-virtualisation/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=371#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Nice! Thanks for VirtualBox!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! Thanks for VirtualBox!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Haygood</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/09/27/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-virtualisation/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Haygood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=371#comment-756</guid>
		<description>VirtualBox is a nice product, and I'm glad it's made available and supported by default in the new openSUSE 10.3!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VirtualBox is a nice product, and I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s made available and supported by default in the new openSUSE 10.3!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
