<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sneak Peeks at openSUSE 10.3: A Plethora of Improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/</link>
	<description>The latest news from the openSUSE project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opensuse updater can NOT resolve dependencies on a default installation of the X86_64 software. I can understand issues of resolving dependencies on complex changes away from default, however failing to resolve default installation dependencies is very poor.

2 Problems: Problem: No valid solution found with just resolvables of best architecture. Problem: atom:samba cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: No valid solution found with just resolvables of best architecture. With this run only resolvables with the best architecture have been regarded. Regarding all possible resolvables takes time, but can come to a valid result. Solution 1: Make a solver run with ALL possibilities. Regarding all resolvables with a compatible architecture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opensuse updater can NOT resolve dependencies on a default installation of the X86_64 software. I can understand issues of resolving dependencies on complex changes away from default, however failing to resolve default installation dependencies is very poor.</p>
<p>2 Problems: Problem: No valid solution found with just resolvables of best architecture. Problem: atom:samba cannot be installed due to missing dependencies Problem: No valid solution found with just resolvables of best architecture. With this run only resolvables with the best architecture have been regarded. Regarding all possible resolvables takes time, but can come to a valid result. Solution 1: Make a solver run with ALL possibilities. Regarding all resolvables with a compatible architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Powersave still has major issues with standard CPU support for managing processor CPU and preventing overheat

In 10.2 Powersave could not manage an Intel P4 HT 3.2 and now it cannot manage an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ in 10.3

Powersave and particularly CPU Frequency Management needs attention

Log Notification follows:

05/12/07 08:36:23	multivac-1	powersaved[6323]	WARNING (CpufreqManagement:51) No capability cpufreq_control

05/12/07 08:36:23	multivac-1	powersaved[6323]	WARNING (CpufreqManagement:51) No capability cpufreq_control]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Powersave still has major issues with standard CPU support for managing processor CPU and preventing overheat</p>
<p>In 10.2 Powersave could not manage an Intel P4 HT 3.2 and now it cannot manage an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ in 10.3</p>
<p>Powersave and particularly CPU Frequency Management needs attention</p>
<p>Log Notification follows:</p>
<p>05/12/07 08:36:23	multivac-1	powersaved[6323]	WARNING (CpufreqManagement:51) No capability cpufreq_control</p>
<p>05/12/07 08:36:23	multivac-1	powersaved[6323]	WARNING (CpufreqManagement:51) No capability cpufreq_control</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You only read old news, or? :-) http://news.opensuse.org/?p=489]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You only read old news, or? :-) <a href="http://news.opensuse.org/?p=489" rel="nofollow">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=489</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aguasanta</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Aguasanta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are SuSe people working on a live-cd or live-dvd installable?  When they go to work on it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are SuSe people working on a live-cd or live-dvd installable?  When they go to work on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyron</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi guys,

I am really new to Linux, I have used K/Ubuntu and openSUSE-10.2 I found SUSE a really easy door in to the Linux world, it right from the easy install and usability of the system. I am only using Windows at the moment as my one problem was I wireless card was not supported at all. I can’t wait until 10.3 finishes downloading I’m sure it will work now and I can do MOST of PC stuff using SUSE instead of windows. It always seemed to run faster and consume way less battery power. Which is what we all want, Right? SO... KUDOS to the SUSE team!!!

Also I don’t believe we should be here complaining about things in this or any other distro! ITS FREE and open source. So if you don’t like something fix it yourself!! Or if you have no idea how to (like me) then maybe you should just be thankful that the SUSE team actually give a crap about what you think and they take their surveys into consideration when creating a new release!! They put their own time in to these projects (mostly) and don’t really have to listen to a thing you whinge about. But they do... 

Once again... KUDOS and thank you. 

Tyron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>I am really new to Linux, I have used K/Ubuntu and openSUSE-10.2 I found SUSE a really easy door in to the Linux world, it right from the easy install and usability of the system. I am only using Windows at the moment as my one problem was I wireless card was not supported at all. I can’t wait until 10.3 finishes downloading I’m sure it will work now and I can do MOST of PC stuff using SUSE instead of windows. It always seemed to run faster and consume way less battery power. Which is what we all want, Right? SO&#8230; KUDOS to the SUSE team!!!</p>
<p>Also I don’t believe we should be here complaining about things in this or any other distro! ITS FREE and open source. So if you don’t like something fix it yourself!! Or if you have no idea how to (like me) then maybe you should just be thankful that the SUSE team actually give a crap about what you think and they take their surveys into consideration when creating a new release!! They put their own time in to these projects (mostly) and don’t really have to listen to a thing you whinge about. But they do&#8230; </p>
<p>Once again&#8230; KUDOS and thank you. </p>
<p>Tyron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m downloading 10.3 now and am convinced that it will be great, like all others previous releases. I&#039;m with SuSE ever since release 6.1...

I have been using 10.2 on my Toshiba Satellite Pro laptop, and there are some issues with the graphics driver. Even the driver provided by AMD has issues, like getting a scrambled screen when switching over to console (and back wouldn&#039;t go as well).

Furthermore, my Toshiba has a SD card reader which can&#039;t be accessed, and the sound controls (obviously designed for Windoze) can&#039;t be used as well.

Is there going to be any real laptop support?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m downloading 10.3 now and am convinced that it will be great, like all others previous releases. I&#8217;m with SuSE ever since release 6.1&#8230;</p>
<p>I have been using 10.2 on my Toshiba Satellite Pro laptop, and there are some issues with the graphics driver. Even the driver provided by AMD has issues, like getting a scrambled screen when switching over to console (and back wouldn&#8217;t go as well).</p>
<p>Furthermore, my Toshiba has a SD card reader which can&#8217;t be accessed, and the sound controls (obviously designed for Windoze) can&#8217;t be used as well.</p>
<p>Is there going to be any real laptop support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiran</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>kiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 03:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like a wonderful distro put together. Solid like it always has been and a pleasure to use. I really don&#039;t understand why some people get into the ubuntu vs opensuse thing. Its such a pointless debate. Anyway congratulations to the Opensuse team for such a cool job!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a wonderful distro put together. Solid like it always has been and a pleasure to use. I really don&#8217;t understand why some people get into the ubuntu vs opensuse thing. Its such a pointless debate. Anyway congratulations to the Opensuse team for such a cool job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to upgrade from suse 10.0 to opensuse 10.3 seamlessly?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to upgrade from suse 10.0 to opensuse 10.3 seamlessly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Leonhardt</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Leonhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/nist_hash_works_2.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/nist_hash_works_2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/nist_hash_works_2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2007/10/02/sneak-peeks-at-opensuse-103-a-plethora-of-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=341#comment-1160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good idea, but either it should be a more secure hash like SHA256 or there should be multiple hashes available.

Bruce Schneier: &quot;Don&#039;t use MD5 and SHA-1 for anything new, and start moving away from it as soon as possible.&quot; 
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/nist_hash_works_2.htmllytt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea, but either it should be a more secure hash like SHA256 or there should be multiple hashes available.</p>
<p>Bruce Schneier: &#8220;Don&#8217;t use MD5 and SHA-1 for anything new, and start moving away from it as soon as possible.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/nist_hash_works_2.htmllytt" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/nist_hash_works_2.htmllytt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
