<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Announcing Hack Week III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.opensuse.org/2008/08/07/announcing-hack-week-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2008/08/07/announcing-hack-week-iii/</link>
	<description>The latest news from the openSUSE project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:45:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2008/08/07/announcing-hack-week-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-4803</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=970#comment-4803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UUH, ryan, I am sorry to say this but you obviously have no clue about why/how OpenSuSe works. The reason why all this is opensource, is so that they don&#039;t become another monopoly like Microsoft. These people, these developer&#039;s are doing all this for us. So that when we want our computer to work, without having to buy a new version of windows every ten days, we just install these operating systems, and get to have a wonderful system. If openSuSE were out to get money (&quot;profit&quot;) then they would have done that YEARS ago, and would be doing exactly what the other monopoles are doing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UUH, ryan, I am sorry to say this but you obviously have no clue about why/how OpenSuSe works. The reason why all this is opensource, is so that they don&#8217;t become another monopoly like Microsoft. These people, these developer&#8217;s are doing all this for us. So that when we want our computer to work, without having to buy a new version of windows every ten days, we just install these operating systems, and get to have a wonderful system. If openSuSE were out to get money (&#8220;profit&#8221;) then they would have done that YEARS ago, and would be doing exactly what the other monopoles are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2008/08/07/announcing-hack-week-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-4482</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=970#comment-4482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The point about Apple...you have to buy their hardware. SUSE is better than that. You can&#039;t buy MacOSX on a retail shelf yet, but Linux remains a possibility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point about Apple&#8230;you have to buy their hardware. SUSE is better than that. You can&#8217;t buy MacOSX on a retail shelf yet, but Linux remains a possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2008/08/07/announcing-hack-week-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-4481</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=970#comment-4481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, don&#039;t misunderstand me. 

The biggest problem with openSOURCE: buy a subscription for one computer and install 20 computers at no additional cost. No profit :(.

openSUSE could still be freely downloaded by anyone! But, there are desktop solutions, peer-to-peer networking solutions, that Novell already has that could be licensed and would allow only for one install on each computer. This would take Microsoft&#039;s business model to Linux - truly the next business model for Linux.

Think about it. If two companies had this kind of offering, but each had a different offering, they could partner and generate more revenue. The result could potentially be a better desktop that people would be willing to pay for. 

Or they could download the version without the proprietary software. What ever they want.

Just don&#039;t be a slave to anyone. Feed your family and let Linux and proprietary software thrive!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, don&#8217;t misunderstand me. </p>
<p>The biggest problem with openSOURCE: buy a subscription for one computer and install 20 computers at no additional cost. No profit :(.</p>
<p>openSUSE could still be freely downloaded by anyone! But, there are desktop solutions, peer-to-peer networking solutions, that Novell already has that could be licensed and would allow only for one install on each computer. This would take Microsoft&#8217;s business model to Linux &#8211; truly the next business model for Linux.</p>
<p>Think about it. If two companies had this kind of offering, but each had a different offering, they could partner and generate more revenue. The result could potentially be a better desktop that people would be willing to pay for. </p>
<p>Or they could download the version without the proprietary software. What ever they want.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t be a slave to anyone. Feed your family and let Linux and proprietary software thrive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2008/08/07/announcing-hack-week-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-4458</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=970#comment-4458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t the whole POINT of &#039;OpenSource&#039; to NOT be locked in to Licensing? (As in NOT Proprietory?)   ---   Also, Apple already does exactly what you&#039;re proposing, and they only have 

5% of the market. --  I believe SuSE do better than that, if they don&#039;t fall into the trap of trying to be another Apple Computer Co.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the whole POINT of &#8216;OpenSource&#8217; to NOT be locked in to Licensing? (As in NOT Proprietory?)   &#8212;   Also, Apple already does exactly what you&#8217;re proposing, and they only have </p>
<p>5% of the market. &#8212;  I believe SuSE do better than that, if they don&#8217;t fall into the trap of trying to be another Apple Computer Co.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2008/08/07/announcing-hack-week-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-4428</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=970#comment-4428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question from hacker hobbiest and concerned N shareholder: What scripting languages are most important/common in this distribution? My knowledge mostly pertains to Windows.

Also, SUSE needs a hardware compatibility program to run before installation. How much of it could be scripted??

Embracing the GNU GPL...

Why not exclusively sell box sets containing a licensed proprietary package (let&#039;s say $100) with manuals, disks, stickers... When entering the PID, it would then be combined with a hardware ID and stored in N&#039;s database so that the license (for the proprietary software) could only be installed on 3 machines. Everything else covered under the GNU GPL will be respected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question from hacker hobbiest and concerned N shareholder: What scripting languages are most important/common in this distribution? My knowledge mostly pertains to Windows.</p>
<p>Also, SUSE needs a hardware compatibility program to run before installation. How much of it could be scripted??</p>
<p>Embracing the GNU GPL&#8230;</p>
<p>Why not exclusively sell box sets containing a licensed proprietary package (let&#8217;s say $100) with manuals, disks, stickers&#8230; When entering the PID, it would then be combined with a hardware ID and stored in N&#8217;s database so that the license (for the proprietary software) could only be installed on 3 machines. Everything else covered under the GNU GPL will be respected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
