Comments on: openSUSE Build Service Did It! http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/ The latest stuff happening in the openSUSE universe Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:32:11 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Adrian http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4797 Adrian Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:22:14 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4797 Ludwig is merging his changes in the official build.rpm package meanwhile. Ludwig is merging his changes in the official build.rpm package meanwhile.

]]> By: Beineri http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4795 Beineri Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:25:36 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4795 Read <a href="http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-kde/2008-09/msg00052.html" rel="nofollow">this</a>. Read this.

]]> By: Werner Schweizer http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4794 Werner Schweizer Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:09:08 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4794 I'm running openSuse 11.0. To try out KDE4.1 I added the repository "KDE4-Factory:Desktop". But when I try to upgrade my KDE4 I get a lot of unresolved references to QT4.4.2 which is not in the repository. How can it be that this repository isn't consistent? Sure, I can get it from QT. But then, it is not a repository package with dependancy checking. MfG Werner Schweizer I’m running openSuse 11.0.
To try out KDE4.1 I added the repository “KDE4-Factory:Desktop”.
But when I try to upgrade my KDE4 I get a lot of unresolved references to QT4.4.2
which is not in the repository. How can it be that this repository isn’t consistent?
Sure, I can get it from QT. But then, it is not a repository package with dependancy checking.
MfG
Werner Schweizer

]]> By: Anonymous http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4781 Anonymous Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:10:51 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4781 You guys rock. More than ever. What you accomplished here is HUGE. You guys rock. More than ever. What you accomplished here is HUGE.

]]> By: Anon http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4774 Anon Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:32:30 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4774 if you are going to be grumpy testing beta's then why are you testing them. Beta's have problems, these things happen, why get all arrogant about it. It's a fact of beta testing. Honestly sometimes I read posts during beta testing and it is like the twats beta testing expected it to be bug free and a final version. if you are going to be grumpy testing beta’s then why are you testing them. Beta’s have problems, these things happen, why get all arrogant about it. It’s a fact of beta testing.

Honestly sometimes I read posts during beta testing and it is like the twats beta testing expected it to be bug free and a final version.

]]> By: David Strozzi http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4772 David Strozzi Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:49:24 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4772 I'm just a grumpy old beta tester. I guess there's a lot of tumult I'e seen over the last few months, with kde4, OOo3, changes in the build system. Almost as bad as Wall St.... I’m just a grumpy old beta tester. I guess there’s a lot of tumult I’e seen over the last few months, with kde4, OOo3, changes in the build system. Almost as bad as Wall St….

]]> By: Adrian http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4762 Adrian Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:05:59 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4762 You are right, but all these bugs are caused by content problems, like the broken binutils. The same problems would be there, if it would have been build with AutoBuild. Only fixing the packages is helping here ;) Btw, you can boot on x86_64 boxes, just the systems with own /boot partitions have problems. You are right, but all these bugs are caused by content problems, like the broken binutils. The same problems would be there, if it would have been build with AutoBuild. Only fixing the packages is helping here ;)

Btw, you can boot on x86_64 boxes, just the systems with own /boot partitions have problems.

]]> By: David Strozzi http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4761 David Strozzi Thu, 25 Sep 2008 06:03:15 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4761 Build Service did what? It laid a turd of a beta release that no can has boot on x86-64 boxes, as myself and many others have reported. Openoffice no can has work (I can't open any existing files), k3b no can has work (requires libdvdread which does not exist), the list goes on. The birth pangs of a new middle east, as Condoleeza Rice said in August 2006................. Build Service did what? It laid a turd of a beta release that no can has boot on x86-64 boxes, as myself and many others have reported. Openoffice no can has work (I can’t open any existing files), k3b no can has work (requires libdvdread which does not exist), the list goes on. The birth pangs of a new middle east, as Condoleeza Rice said in August 2006……………..

]]> By: Ben http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4754 Ben Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:25:17 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4754 Where is the 2.23/2.24 GNOME Build Service? All i see is 2.22 and 2.24 is set to be released tomorrow (9-24) Where is the 2.23/2.24 GNOME Build Service? All i see is 2.22 and 2.24 is set to be released tomorrow (9-24)

]]> By: j_engelh http://news.opensuse.org/2008/09/22/obs-did-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4751 j_engelh Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:17:25 +0000 http://news.opensuse.org/?p=1026#comment-4751 Let's hope Ludwig Nussel's lbuild does not fade out as a reason of this move. Let’s hope Ludwig Nussel’s lbuild does not fade out as a reason of this move.

]]>