<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Announcing the Second openSUSE Board Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.opensuse.org/2009/10/26/announcing-the-second-opensuse-borad-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2009/10/26/announcing-the-second-opensuse-borad-election/</link>
	<description>The latest news from the openSUSE project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jik</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2009/10/26/announcing-the-second-opensuse-borad-election/comment-page-1/#comment-7964</link>
		<dc:creator>jik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=2388#comment-7964</guid>
		<description>I think, that OpenSUSE is very good base. But I VERY lack the long-term supported, KDE based clon of OpenSUSE.
I supported some computers and OpenSUSE is not a good solutions for it. OpenSUSE is for enhusiasts, which wants the newest software and &#039;plays&#039; with it. Yes, I am enthusiast. 
But I also need more stable distribution for at least 3 years, I need distribution with finalized details, that is &#039;fool-proof&#039;. I see big free space for distribution oriented for SOHO and I think, that only a very small work is need for finalizing it. I think, that this clon should be paid - I preffered it, I think, that 10-20 EUR would be suitable pay for 3-4 years support (and development and advertising...).
I am very interesting to achieve constituting that distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, that OpenSUSE is very good base. But I VERY lack the long-term supported, KDE based clon of OpenSUSE.<br />
I supported some computers and OpenSUSE is not a good solutions for it. OpenSUSE is for enhusiasts, which wants the newest software and &#8216;plays&#8217; with it. Yes, I am enthusiast.<br />
But I also need more stable distribution for at least 3 years, I need distribution with finalized details, that is &#8216;fool-proof&#8217;. I see big free space for distribution oriented for SOHO and I think, that only a very small work is need for finalizing it. I think, that this clon should be paid &#8211; I preffered it, I think, that 10-20 EUR would be suitable pay for 3-4 years support (and development and advertising&#8230;).<br />
I am very interesting to achieve constituting that distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrdls</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2009/10/26/announcing-the-second-opensuse-borad-election/comment-page-1/#comment-7919</link>
		<dc:creator>jrdls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=2388#comment-7919</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry to hear you have problems with openSUSE, but still this is not the place to discuss your issues (for that I suggest the forums, especially the soapbox section). You are expected in this context to comment about the openSUSE board election. It is good to stay on topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to hear you have problems with openSUSE, but still this is not the place to discuss your issues (for that I suggest the forums, especially the soapbox section). You are expected in this context to comment about the openSUSE board election. It is good to stay on topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlbertoP</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2009/10/26/announcing-the-second-opensuse-borad-election/comment-page-1/#comment-7918</link>
		<dc:creator>AlbertoP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=2388#comment-7918</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but openSUSE 11.2 is not released yet, so it is not fair to consider it a stable release.

Best,
A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but openSUSE 11.2 is not released yet, so it is not fair to consider it a stable release.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disappointment</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2009/10/26/announcing-the-second-opensuse-borad-election/comment-page-1/#comment-7916</link>
		<dc:creator>Disappointment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=2388#comment-7916</guid>
		<description>What a great disappointment, Suse 11.1 and 11.2. It is extremely slow, even with high-speed Internet takes so long to get off, the display indicates 1 hour and after 5 to 24 hours, downloading and installing brand mistakes, does not recognize many peripherals are cops. The stable version promised time is not met, the aid does not work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great disappointment, Suse 11.1 and 11.2. It is extremely slow, even with high-speed Internet takes so long to get off, the display indicates 1 hour and after 5 to 24 hours, downloading and installing brand mistakes, does not recognize many peripherals are cops. The stable version promised time is not met, the aid does not work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

