<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux is 20 years old!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.opensuse.org/2011/04/08/linux-is-20-years-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2011/04/08/linux-is-20-years-old/</link>
	<description>The latest news from the openSUSE project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willem Franssen</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2011/04/08/linux-is-20-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-30485</link>
		<dc:creator>Willem Franssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 03:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=8396#comment-30485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a Linux user myself since about 4 years. I have to notice still after these 20 years Linux never reached the desktop-, laptop-, netbook-, tablet- and mobile market. In Android Linux is somewhere deep under the hood. No common consumer has ever heard of Linux. Is it the wrong appreciation of the consumer? I don&#039;t think so. There&#039;s just one principle:the consumer is always right. He takes what he likes and there must be a reason for. I think there is something wrong in the whole concept behind Linux and with the attitude of several distribution communities towards users.

After 20 years of Linux it might be time for some self reflection. Linux still has too many idealists and purists and too little vendors. Most of the distributions have poor marketing, or no proper marketing at all. Does the existence of more than 100 different distributions mean there is freedom of choice? No. The more choice the more confusion. Besides that Linux is nothing but a kernel, so it is no brand. The distributions themselves are no clear brands either. 

So there&#039;s work to do and a different way of thinking is needed. At least that&#039;s my opinion as a user. It&#039;s a pitty cause Linux in itself is a good os and the main distributions like ie Ubuntu, OpenSUSE and Fedora are great and should be appreciated by the consumer market as well. Where as this is not the case it&#039;s not the fault of the consumer, but of Linux.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Linux user myself since about 4 years. I have to notice still after these 20 years Linux never reached the desktop-, laptop-, netbook-, tablet- and mobile market. In Android Linux is somewhere deep under the hood. No common consumer has ever heard of Linux. Is it the wrong appreciation of the consumer? I don&#8217;t think so. There&#8217;s just one principle:the consumer is always right. He takes what he likes and there must be a reason for. I think there is something wrong in the whole concept behind Linux and with the attitude of several distribution communities towards users.</p>
<p>After 20 years of Linux it might be time for some self reflection. Linux still has too many idealists and purists and too little vendors. Most of the distributions have poor marketing, or no proper marketing at all. Does the existence of more than 100 different distributions mean there is freedom of choice? No. The more choice the more confusion. Besides that Linux is nothing but a kernel, so it is no brand. The distributions themselves are no clear brands either. </p>
<p>So there&#8217;s work to do and a different way of thinking is needed. At least that&#8217;s my opinion as a user. It&#8217;s a pitty cause Linux in itself is a good os and the main distributions like ie Ubuntu, OpenSUSE and Fedora are great and should be appreciated by the consumer market as well. Where as this is not the case it&#8217;s not the fault of the consumer, but of Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnua</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2011/04/08/linux-is-20-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-30428</link>
		<dc:creator>dnua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=8396#comment-30428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How quickly time has passed. Linux -20!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How quickly time has passed. Linux -20!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASI</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2011/04/08/linux-is-20-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-29647</link>
		<dc:creator>ASI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=8396#comment-29647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Linux#The_creation_of_Linux]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Linux#The_creation_of_Linux" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Linux#The_creation_of_Linux</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Albert</title>
		<link>http://news.opensuse.org/2011/04/08/linux-is-20-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-29577</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.opensuse.org/?p=8396#comment-29577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short but interesting information. I assumed that LINUX is somewhat older than 20 years. I&#039;m using LINUX since 15 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short but interesting information. I assumed that LINUX is somewhat older than 20 years. I&#8217;m using LINUX since 15 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
